5/27/2023 0 Comments Jbl charge 5 best price![]() ![]() Centred on the bottom is a series of rubber-like strips to give the speaker a bit of grip when set down. While the top of the speaker is relatively flat, so to speak, the bottom curves up on the sides. Like many portable Bluetooth speakers, the JBL Charge 5 has a horizontal cylindrical design. JBL Charge 5 Transducer 52mm x 90mm woofer 20mm tweeter Rated output power 30W RMS for woofer, 10W RMS for tweeter Frequency response 20Hz – 20kHz Signal-to-noise ratio >80dB Battery type Li-ion polymer 27Wh (equivalent to 3.6 V/7500 mAh) Battery charge time 4 hours (5V/3A) Music play time Up to 20 hours (dependent on volume level and audio content) USB port Type-C in, Type-A out USB rating 5V/2A (maximum) Bluetooth version 5.1 Bluetooth profile A2DP 1.3, AVRCP 1.6 Bluetooth transmitter frequency range 24000MHz – 2483.5MHz Bluetooth transmitter power ≤20dBm (EIRP) Bluetooth transmitter modulation GFSK, π/4 DQPSK, 8DPSK Dimensions 223 x 96.5 x 94mm (8.7 x 3.76 x 3.67″) Weight 0.96 kg (2.11 lbs) What’s in the box Power up with the built-in powerbank Model No.You would get far better results at 1/3 the price.The JBL Charge 5 Bluetooth speaker we reviewed has the following features and specifications: If you truly want to hear stereo separation, use headphones or buy a decent set of bookshelf speakers. ![]() So which one matters to you? I'd go with the one that is audible than that one which is inaudible but makes me feel good cause I 'know' I'm using a stereo set-up. You can hear the difference in bass between a mono and stereo set-up but you can't hear stereo separation at that close distance. So, going stereo in this case at the expense of bass is just useless since you can't hear the stereo separation at that close distance anyway. Truthfully speaking, it's impossible to hear "true stereo" unless there's a distance of at least 1 meter between the speakers. You just have to choose between a stereo set-up (but anemic in bass) or a mono set-up (but fuller and thicker in the bass). Again, if we're talking 'portable' speakers, there will always be compromises in terms of what the speaker can physically do. I don't want to see another ignorant comment or post like this again talking about how manufacturers are shit for moving to mono instead of the usual stereo set-up. I hope this clears things up for all the readers who will read this comment. But all things equal, the two smaller drivers will only be able to produce the same level of loudness in the bass, but it will never be able to pump out the same level of deep and resonating bass as the larger mono driver can, all due to physical limitations. The only exception to this is if they use a high excursion or long throw driver but that is going to cost a lot more and there are going to be issues with distortion and linearity if they go the high excursion/long throw route. Two separate smaller drivers just can't physically move the same volume of air as a larger mono driver can. They are doing this because it's the only way you can produce deep thumping bass at such a small enclosure. Manufacturers aren't doing this just so they can cut costs or downgrade from previous models. A LARGE diameter MONO driver will be able to move lots more air volume (thereby producing more bass) than TWO separate SMALLER drivers. What most people like you don't get is that in order to move lots of air in a small package, you will HAVE to go MONO. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |